Backup vs Archive
Explain recoverability versus long-term record preservation.
Purpose
Backup work is not complete when files are copied; it is complete when recovery expectations are understood and restore evidence exists. Recovery time and recovery point expectations should be written before a crisis.
Plain meaning
Backup vs Archive is included as a practical term because teams often use it inconsistently. Before a workflow or policy can work, the people using it need the same operating definition.
How to use this term
- Use the term in decisions, not as decoration.
- Pair it with an owner, evidence source, or review trigger when possible.
- If people disagree about meaning, add a short local definition to the relevant template or policy.
When to use
- When the work repeats often enough that memory is no longer reliable.
- When more than one person may request, perform, review, or inherit the work.
- When risk, approval, evidence, or handoff needs to be visible later.
Common failure modes
- Backups exist but cannot be restored.
- Retention does not match operational or legal need.
- Ownership is unclear during restore pressure.
Review guidance
Review this page after a material incident, after a role or system change, and on a normal cadence appropriate to its risk. During review, check whether the owner is still correct, whether inputs are still complete, whether the output is still useful, and whether related pages need updates.
External guidance
These resources are references for terminology, control thinking, or review design. DailyWF adapts the ideas into lightweight operating pages rather than reproducing full standards.
- NIST SP 800-34 Rev. 1 Contingency Planning GuideContingency planning concepts useful for recovery and continuity workflows.
- NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0General cybersecurity risk management structure: govern, identify, protect, detect, respond, recover.