DDailyWF

Change Request Review

Review a proposed change before it affects production work.

Purpose

Change work should separate intent, risk, approval, communication, execution, validation, and rollback. The purpose is not to slow change; it is to prevent avoidable surprise.

  1. Trigger. Define the event that starts change request review.
  2. Input check. Confirm that the request contains enough information to act.
  3. Ownership. Assign one accountable owner and any contributors.
  4. Decision point. Identify whether approval, escalation, or clarification is needed.
  5. Execution. Perform the work with attention to risk and dependencies.
  6. Output and evidence. Record the result, unresolved items, and review date.

When to use

  • When the work repeats often enough that memory is no longer reliable.
  • When more than one person may request, perform, review, or inherit the work.
  • When risk, approval, evidence, or handoff needs to be visible later.

Common failure modes

  • Rollback is assumed but not practical.
  • Affected users are notified too late.
  • Validation checks do not prove the intended result.

Review guidance

Review this page after a material incident, after a role or system change, and on a normal cadence appropriate to its risk. During review, check whether the owner is still correct, whether inputs are still complete, whether the output is still useful, and whether related pages need updates.

External guidance

These resources are references for terminology, control thinking, or review design. DailyWF adapts the ideas into lightweight operating pages rather than reproducing full standards.